Statement & Narrative Pass
Focused review of personal statements, research narratives, or purpose essays for clarity, honesty, and alignment with the call.
Review details
Fieldstone Review Co.
We audit applications the way a careful committee reads them—checking eligibility, evidence, and internal consistency before you stamp and send.
What we review
Packets that carry real stakes
Grant dossiers, graduate admissions files, fellowship applications, and professional licensing packets—each read against the programme’s own criteria, not a generic checklist.
Eligibility & Criteria Check
Early-stage screening of whether your background and evidence meet a programme’s stated requirements before you invest weeks of drafting.
Review details
Referee Letter Guidance
Practical coaching for applicants coordinating recommendation letters—what to brief referees on, and how to spot thin or mismatched letters.
Review details
Flagship engagement
Full Application Audit
A senior reviewer reads your entire packet—forms, narratives, budgets, and supporting letters—then returns a written report with prioritised revisions. You keep authorship; we supply scrutiny.
Typical turnaround is five to eight business days from a complete file. Rush windows open when capacity allows.
How the audit works8
Business-day window for a standard full audit
25+
Pages covered in the standard packet rate
45
Minute follow-up conversation included
From recent audits
What applicants notice
Specific catches and mild frustrations—not vague praise. Read more on our client stories page.
“The audit caught a residency mismatch between my form and my landlord letter three days before the foundation’s portal closed. Fixing it was tedious, but better than a silent disqualification.”
“I wished the turnaround on my fellowship packet had been a day faster—our lab schedule was brutal that week—but the prioritised revision list meant I knew exactly what to cut first.”
“The eligibility check saved me from drafting a 40-page proposal for a call that required a licence I will not hold until next year. We redirected to a smaller seed fund instead.”
How we work
A review process built around the call text
Every engagement begins with the programme handbook—not our preferences. We map criteria, test claim-to-evidence links, and flag contradictions across forms before suggesting any rewrite.
Walk through the processField notes
Guides from the reading desk
Practical notes on dossiers, referees, and when to pause a submission.
What a careful application audit actually looks for
Beyond spelling and formatting: the five places where grant and admissions packets usually weaken under scrutiny.
Read the note
Building a dossier for Thai scholarship and fellowship calls
Local calls often ask for documents that international templates omit. Here is how we prepare applicants working from Nonthaburi and beyond.
Read the note
How to brief a referee without writing their letter for them
A clear brief helps your referee speak to the criteria. Crossing into ghostwriting helps no one.
Read the noteBring us the draft you are almost ready to send
Share the call guidelines and your packet. We reply within two business days with scope, timing, and a fee estimate.