Engagement

From intake packet to findings walkthrough

Application audits here follow a fixed sequence so release leads know what access to grant, who we will interview, and when written findings arrive relative to your freeze date.

Calendar and annotated papers planning an audit engagement
  1. 1

    Intake & access

    You send the application inventory, recent release notes, deploy documentation, and named contacts for build, release, and on-call. We confirm the audit window against your freeze calendar and list the repositories and environments we need to read.

  2. 2

    Evidence review

    We examine pipelines, change tickets, rollback drills, alert routing, and the last three production incidents tied to the application. Notes stay in a shared findings draft — nothing leaves your tenancy without agreement.

  3. 3

    Stakeholder conversations

    Short interviews with the release owner, a pager carrier, and one developer who ships frequently. We ask how a bad deploy is stopped today, not how the runbook says it should be stopped.

  4. 4

    Findings register

    You receive a written register with severity, evidence pointers, and suggested owners. Critical items are called out against your proposed release date so you can decide what blocks go-live.

  5. 5

    Walkthrough

    A ninety-minute session to walk the register with your team, answer challenges, and agree a remediation order. Optional follow-up review of closed items is available as a separate half-day.

What you prepare

  • Named application and environments in scope
  • Read access to source, pipeline, and observability consoles
  • Release calendar with freeze and go-live dates
  • Incident list for the prior six months

What we never do

  • Change production configuration during the audit
  • Run load tests without a separate agreement
  • Share findings outside your named recipients
Browse audit offers Ask for a start week